RoofViews

Science du bâtiment

GAF Shafter Plant
Science du bâtiment

GAF Scaling Environmental Product Declarations—Publishes 21 EPDs

At GAF, we're serious about our sustainability promise: to protect what matters most, including our people, our communities, and our planet. We recently published 21 new GAF product-specific Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) as one way we're delivering on that promise.EPDs are critical to improving green building solutions. These standardized and third-party-verified documents outline the environmental impacts associated with a building product's life cycle-from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal or reuse. Through the EPD creation process, we have been advancing on our sustainability goals, demonstrating our commitment to the environment and our customers, and increasing product sustainability in the roofing industry.Here's a look at our most recent progress and what's expected to come.GAF Sustainability GoalsThe 21 new EPDs are an exciting milestone toward our GAF 2030 Planet Goals, which have four focus areas: increase product transparency, reduce carbon emissions, drive circularity in the roofing sector, and divert operational waste. By 2030, we plan to publish EPDs for our entire commercial and residential core product portfolio. As we've scaled the GAF EPD creation process, through extensive life cycle assessments across our portfolio, we better understand the environmental impact of each stage in our products' life cycles. This opens up internal and external sustainability opportunities as we learn from, and analyze, our life cycle assessment results.Evolving to Product-Specific Environmental Product DeclarationsRoofing has long relied on industry-wide EPDs created from aggregate product data. As a result, our architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) community members have had fewer opportunities to make informed sustainability choices around roofing materials.According to several sources, the built environment accounts for 39 % of global energy-related carbon emissions worldwide. Collectively, we as a roofing industry could help reduce this number by increasing our transparency documentation. With more product-specific Environmental Product Declarations, companies and customers can make more informed product sustainability decisions.And although GAF currently has the highest overall number of transparency documents for roofing materials in the industry, we know we also have an opportunity to grow.GAF Uses Life Cycle Assessments to ImproveWe review product Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) to understand the environmental impact of each product's production stages, from raw material extraction to end-of-life. Then, we can use that information to identify areas of improvement and make informed decisions to reduce a product's environmental impact, resulting in a reduction in embodied carbon. The knowledge we gain from our LCAs creates the potential for product improvements and new innovations to help further our 2030 Planet Goals.Looking Toward 2030 and BeyondWe're working hard to continue leading the industry with transparency documentation such as EPDs, Health Product Declarations, and Declare Labels. But we're not stopping there.We're fostering collaboration in our broader building, construction, and design space to help reduce the built environment's total carbon emissions. At GAF, sustainability isn't checking a box. We believe in and champion protecting our homes and our planet. By changing how we do business, we hope to improve how builders can build and, ultimately, how our world lives.Empowering the AEC CommunityTransparency and product sustainability documentation help us all build a better world. We're committed to empowering designers, builders, architects, and engineers by providing information about the lifecycle and environmental impact of GAF products whenever possible.Explore some of our most recent EPDs below.Polyiso InsulationEnergyGuard™ Barrier. Polyiso InsulationEnergyGuard™ HD and HD Barrier Polyiso Cover BoardEnergyGuard™ HD Plus Polyiso Cover BoardEnergyGuard™ NH Barrier Polyiso InsulationEnergyGuard™ NH HD Plus Polyiso Cover BoardEnergyGuard™ NH HD Polyiso Cover BoardEnergyGuard™ NH Polyiso InsulationEnergyGuard™ NH Ultra Polyiso InsulationEnergyGuard™ NH Ultra Tapered Polyiso InsulationEnergyGuard™ Polyiso InsulationEnergyGuard™ Ultra Polyiso InsulationUltra HD Composite InsulationTPO Single-Ply MembraneEverGuard® TPO Extreme Fleece-backEverGuard® TPO ExtremeEverGuard® TPOEverGuard® TPO Fleece-backEverGuard® SA TPO Self-Adhered Roof MembranePVCEverGuard® PVCEverGuard® PVC Fleece-back Roof CoatingsHydroStop® System GAF Acrylic Top CoatLooking to explore more sustainable design solutions? You can learn how GAF is investing in our people, our planet, and progress for a more sustainable future, here.

By Aly Perez

13 août 2024

Featured Blogs

  • Architects and the GAF team working together to problem solve.
    Science du bâtiment

    GAF et la communauté de conception : Entretoiser l'écart avec la coopérative de conception

    GAF continue d'améliorer ses services pour répondre aux besoins des clients. Cela inclut réfléchir de plus en plus aux défis auxquels les concepteurs font face et comment l'entreprise peut offrir des solutions. As a result, the design community can turn to GAF for comprehensive support from day one of their commercial projects.The Designer's CollectiveIn support of this effort, GAF recently hosted its first Designer's Collective. The three-day event in New Jersey brought 11 of the East Coast's most influential architects and design consultants together with GAF department leaders.Regional Sales Directors Natalia Gallo (Mid-Atlantic), Larry Cargal (Gulf Coast), and Cory Yawger (North East), cohosted and organized the event as a series of roundtables and one-on-one conversations. The intimate forum allowed the design community to express needs and concerns directly to GAF department heads, plus give real-time feedback on existing GAF resources for architects and specifiers.GAF team members Natalia Gallo, Cynthia McArthur, Larry Cargal and Monica Wynn ready to learn from attendees The Outdated Gap"GAF started as a shingle manufacturer," explained Gallo. This meant that the company relied on contractors for an invitation to the table on commercial projects. But having manufacturers participate so late in the game was a disservice to owners, architects, project budgets, and the buildings themselves.GAF can provide expertise across several segments of the roofing industry including Commercial and Solar. With so many resources, GAF knew it was time for the relationship with designers to also evolve and grow. "Architects have a partner in GAF, not just a vendor," said Gallo. "And we will help them guide their own customers to the right solution for their particular building."It's nearly impossible for any single design firm to stay completely abreast of the constant changes in building codes. "That's why so many firms specialize," said Cargal. But GAF wants to and can help relieve the burden of navigating projects alone.That's why GAF territory managers "show the architect, step-by-step," what is needed for a commercial project as well as the support available to them. "It's not about sales," said Cargal. "It's about education."Opportunities for ImprovementGAF already offers architects comprehensive field services, technical support, and architectural services via the GAF Design Services team. But the Designer's Collective created an opportunity to further prioritize the design community's needs. When manufacturers can put more of their focus on the architects, everyone wins.Designer's Collective attendees outside of GAF headquartersBetter Project and Building Outcomes"When we know the building owner's goals, capital budget, and operating expense, we can better match the utility of roof assembly to the goals of their building and budget," said Cargal. Without a manufacturer-designer connection, it's left up to the roofer and general contractor who might have different goals. This means the owner's goals could get lost. As a result, "quality and budget can suffer, and the longevity of the building suffers, too," said Cargal.More Time and Resources Saved for Architects"In today's world, one thing you can't afford to waste is time," said Gallo. A close relationship between architects and manufacturers means GAF can directly address pain points instead of presuming. "When we know exactly what architects need, we can save them time," said Gallo. "That's the difference between service and hospitality. Making our customer important enough that we center their needs in the equation."Learning from the Design Community about Their ChallengesThe Designer's Collective provided the framework for architects to convey their industry needs, while also forging personal relationships with GAF leaders. In contrast to larger GAF events in the past, the Designer's Collective was intimate, explained Gallo. As a result, these designers and the GAF department heads are just a phone call away from each other for requests, concerns, and real-time feedback on GAF products and designs.Here are some key insights attendees shared, which will help the GAF team uncover new opportunities to help minimize these issues and support the customer.Employee ShortagesArchitects are observing labor shortages. Overworked principal architects need employee training support. Firms are having trouble getting existing employees to come into offices.Time ResourcesMany designers find they waste time navigating manufacturer websites to find necessary code and installation information.One existing tool GAF has in place today is our Design Services Resources. In addition to the information and assets available on the website, the Design Services team engages on a national scale with associations like the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI), American Institute of Architects (AIA), and International Institute of Building Enclosure Consultants (IIBEC) to bridge the education gap on the latest codes and trends in building design.Product DifferentiationIt's a challenge to differentiate GAF products and warranties, and explain performance value to building owners.Cargal explained that GAF's warranties are lateralized across all systems. "It can be hard for architects to differentiate between importance of or value of different products and warranties," he said. "This event really helped us open our eyes to how we could help architects to help owners to understand."Closing the GapEvents like the Designer's Collective allow architects to "be more of a stakeholder in the process," said Gallo. "A direct relationship with manufacturers can increase the revenue to architects' own customers, because they can serve those customers better."When the gap is closed, owners get a better finished product and a better performing building, explained Cargal. "We're serving architects exactly where they need us to. Without events like the Designer's Collective, we're in the dark about architects needs."Learn more about events like the Designer's Collective and how to receive technical and design support, sustainable options, system integrations, code approvals, and much more from the GAF team.

    By Annie Crawford

    14 février 2023

  • wind
    Science du bâtiment

    Vent dominant et codes dominants : Un résumé des modifications de la norme ASCE 7-22 relatives aux toitures

    Plusieurs modifications ont été apportées à la version 2022 de la norme ASCE 7 relative aux toitures. Vous pourriez vous dire : « Dès que je maîtrise la norme ASCE 7-16, une version mise à jour doit être publiée ». Comme pour toute norme, il est probable que des mises à jour soient effectuées pour inclure les recherches ou les tendances actuelles. Si la prise en compte des charges des tornades et les modifications des combinaisons de charges qui en résultent sont peut-être les plus importantes, d'autres mises à jour sont également liées aux toitures. Des mises à jour mineures aux cartes de base relatives à la vitesse du vent, en passant par les toits en gradins et les pavés, nous avons compilé un résumé pour vous aider à parcourir les mises à jour. Ne vous inquiétez pas, les modifications ne seront probablement pas incluses avant la version 2024 de l'IBC. However, that does not preclude incorporating these changes on current and upcoming projects.Why are these Changes Significant?The goal of the calculations in ASCE 7 are to determine the uplift pressures on a roof given project constraints including building height, location, and Risk Category. The resulting uplift pressures are then compared with tested roof assemblies to determine which assembly(ies) can be installed on a roof for each unique building. The assembly selection will also dictate the fastening method, whether it be mechanically fastened or adhered, and also the number and spacing of selected attachments. Changes in the Code may affect calculated uplift pressures that may influence the available roof assemblies.What is the Update? Updated Basic Wind Speed MapsWind speeds vary rapidly and are continuously being recorded at various locations around the world. Wind speeds are recorded in miles per hour (mph) in 3-second intervals and are collected over the course of a year. Then, the maximum values of the 3-second intervals are recorded and tracked to see the occurrence throughout the year. Since wind is a random phenomenon and the speeds vary not only by day, but also by year, the maximum 3-second intervals for each year are compared over several years. Rather than simply taking an average of wind speeds over time, the average wind speeds are analyzed by determining the Mean Recurrence Interval (MRI), which is how frequently a wind speed is equaled or exceeded during any given period of time (in years). Generally, higher wind speeds have a lower recurrence interval over time, and lower wind speeds have a higher recurrence rate over time. Analyzing this data is how wind speeds for a particular location are established.Wind speed (mph) has to be translated into units of force (psf) for design purposes in accordance with ASCE-7. The resulting forces are different in various roof zones.ASCE 7-16 has published basic wind speed contour maps for each Risk Category. The wind speed maps have contour lines that show the wind speeds throughout the United States as they vary by geographical location. It is allowable to interpolate between the contour lines, or the larger value listed on the contour line may be used. Additionally, if a location-specific wind speed is desired, an online Hazard Tool developed by ASCE will give an exact wind speed based on an address or GPS coordinates. The 2022 version updated wind speeds, primarily along the coastline. Wind speeds have generally either decreased by a few miles per hour or remained unchanged from ASCE 7-16, with the exception of several cities along the Gulf of Mexico coastline that have increased wind speeds due to recent hurricanes that have made landfall.Basic wind speeds from select coastal locations in hurricane prone regions at 33 ft for Exposure Category C are shown below. Wind speed data is shown for both ASCE 7-16 and ASCE 7-22 as a comparison.What is the Update? Wind directionality factor, Kd was movedThe wind directionality factor, Kd, was removed from the Velocity Pressure Coefficient and inserted into the Components and Cladding design wind pressures equation.The directionality factor (Kd) is a load reduction factor intended to take into account a reduced probability that the maximum wind speed will exactly coincide with the weakest direction of a building. According to ASCE 7, it accounts for the probability that the wind speed will come from any one direction given a location, and the maximum wind speed will occur from the direction that produces the maximum wind pressure on the building or its components. The directionality factor has constant factors to be used for Main Force Resisting Systems or Components and Cladding, but also accounts for various shapes of structures such as arched roofs, circular domes, and chimneys or tanks.In ASCE 7-16, Kd was located in the Velocity Pressure Equation (eq. 26,1-1) where velocity pressure, qh, is evaluated at the mean roof height, h. Where qh= qz .qh=0,003KhKztKdKeV2 Which provides a velocity pressure in pounds per square foot (psf).The resulting value of qh is then multiplied by the external pressure coefficients (GCp) and then used to determine the wind pressure coefficients for each roof zone (perimeter, corner, field, etc.)p = qh [(Gcp) - (GCpi)] (lb/ft2)In ASCE 7-22, the velocity pressure, qh, is evaluated at the mean roof height, h. Where qh= qz by the following equation (eq. 26,1-1):qh=0,003KhKztKeV2 Which provides a velocity pressure in pounds per square foot (psf).As you can see, the directionality factor, Kd, has been removed from the equation. In calculations for both the Main Wind Force Resisting System and Components and Cladding, Kd, has been inserted into the equations. However, since we are focusing on the roof, this falls within the Components and Cladding (C&C) calculations in Chapter 30. The design wind pressures of C&C elements are calculated with the following equations:For low rise buildings with h≤ 60 ft: (eq. 30,3-1)p = qh Kd[(Gcp) - (GCpi)] (lb/ft2)For low rise buildings with h＞60 ft: (eq. 30,4-1)p = q Kd[(Gcp) - qi Kd(GCpi)] (lb/ft2)What is the Update? Velocity Pressure Coefficients, Kz and Kh updatedThe Velocity Pressure Coefficients, Kz and Kh, for Exposures B and C were updated. Kz is the velocity pressure coefficient evaluated at height z, and Kh is the velocity pressure coefficient evaluated at height z = h. The velocity pressure at mean roof height h uses Kz. The variables are inserted into equation 26,1 to determine Velocity Pressure, qz (see equations above).What is the Update? Simplified Methods for Calculating C&C RemovedThe two simplified methods, Part 2 and Part 4 were removed from Chapter 30, Wind Loads, Components and Cladding.In the 2016 version there were two simplified methods that allowed for reduced calculations:Part 1 included calculations for Low-Rise BuildingsPart 2 was for Low-Rise Building (simplified)Part 3 included calculations for buildings with h> 60ftPart 4 was for buildings 60 ft<>Part 5 is Open BuildingsPart 6 included Building Appurtenances, Rooftop Structures, and Equipment.The 2022 version has removed the two simplified methods:Part 1 for Low-Rise BuildingsPart 2 is for buildings with h> 60ftPart 3 is Open BuildingsPart 4 includes Building Appurtenances, Rooftop Structures, and Equipment.What is the Update? Section 30,12 was added to address roof paversRoof pavers are used in IRMA (Inverted Roof Membrane Assembly) and PMRA (Protected Membrane Roof Assembly) assemblies where the roofing components are installed at the structural roof deck level and then the pavers are installed as ballast on top of the roof assembly. Roof pavers vary in size, thickness, material, and spacing, in addition to installation method and pedestal size. Pavers are considered air permeable since the gaps between pavers and the space beneath the pedestals allow for partial air pressure equalization between the surfaces. Roof pavers were only addressed in the Commentary Section C30,1 of the 2016 version and are referred to as Air Permeable Cladding. However, siding, pressure equalized rain screen walls, shingles, tiles, and aggregate roof surfacing were all included in this category. In ASCE 7-16, 'because of partial air-pressure equalization provided by air-permeable claddings, the C&C pressures services from Chapter 30 can overestimate the load on cladding elements. The designer may elect to use the loads derived from Chapter 30 or those derived by an alternate method.' While equations and methods are not included in this edition, several references are included where calculation methods may be found.In the commentary of ASCE 7-22, air permeable cladding is still defined as roof or wall claddings that allow partial air pressure equalization between the exterior and interior surfaces, with the same listing of claddings to include siding, roof pavers, and vegetative modular trays. The designer may elect to calculate the net uplift pressures of the pavers with recognized literature as noted in ASCE 7016 or Section 30.12. Section 30,12 was added to include Roof Pavers for Buildings of all heights with roof slopes less than or equal to 7 degrees. The Section includes an equation (eq. 30,12-1) to calculate design net uplift pressures:p = qhKdCLnet (lb/ft2)What is the Update? Roof Zones were revised for Hip and Gable RoofsAs wind blows over roof surfaces, it creates suction, or uplift, on the roof assemblies. The amount of uplift varies by building height, location (associated wind speed), and other factors unique to each building. The uplift created on the building is not uniformly distributed, and will vary depending on factors such as roof shape. Wind uplift is highest at the corners, then perimeters, and is the least in the field, or center of the roof; these varying wind uplift locations are called roof zones.Hip Roofs are where all four sides of the roof slopes down to connect to the exterior walls at the eaves. Gable roofs have two slanted sides that form a ridge that connect to the vertical walls that extend to the ridge. Chapter 30 of both ASCE 7-16 and 7-22 include roof zone diagrams and graphics that can be used to determine the External Pressure Coefficients (GCp).Image 1: Hip roof Image 2: Gable roofImages 1 and 2: Hip roof and gable roof, images courtesy of roofingcalc.comIn ASCE 7-22, both the roof zone diagrams and the graphics to determine GCp are updated. The roof zones are simplified to have three zones, Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 (in lieu of Zone 1, Zone 2r, Zone 2e, and Zone 3), and the accompanying zone layout was modified to include the Zone changes. The External Pressure Coefficients are determined using graphics, and those also have been updated and simplified.Components and Cladding, h ≤ 60 ft, Gable Roofs Roof Slopes 7°≤Θ≤ 20° and 20°≤Θ≤ 27°Components and Cladding, h ≤ 60 ft, Gable Roofs Roof Slopes 27°≤Θ≤ 45°Hip roofs have one roof zone layout plan for all roof slopes, however, External pressure Coefficients graphs were updated for each.What is the Update? Roof Zones were revised for Stepped RoofsStepped roofs are where buildings have multiple flat roof levels, which are often seen on large hospitals, offices, and school buildings. While stepped roofs have wind uplift pressures and corresponding roof zones, it is important to note that wind on the lower roof is affected by the neighboring higher roof sections. At the intersection of the higher roof section with the lower roof section, the wind uplift pressures are lower.New diagrams have been inserted into Chapter 30 of the ASCE 7-22 version. The primary change to note is that the corner zones, zone 3, have been changed from square shapes to L shapes. This is a reflection of the standard roof zones which have been updated from square corners to L shaped corners in more recent versions of ASCE as well.ASCE 7-16, Figure 30,3-3 Components and Cladding, h ≤ 60 ftASCE 7-22, Figure 30,3-3 Components and Cladding, h ≤ 60 ftWhat are the next steps?It is anticipated that ASCE 7-22 will be adopted in the 2024 version of the IBC, so there is plenty of time to get comfortable with the updates. And as always, feel free to reach out to the Building & Roofing Science team at buildingscience@gaf.com with questions.

    By Kristin Westover

    Le 07 septembre 2022

  • Polyiso installation
    Science du bâtiment

    Conception avec polyiso

    L'isolation thermique est une partie importante des assemblages de toitures commerciales. Comme pour toute chose, il existe plusieurs façons de concevoir et d'installer l'isolation polyiso : une meilleure façon, la meilleure façon, et de nombreuses variantes entre les deux! What may be best in terms of lowest up-front costs, may prove only good or worse over the long-term life of the building.As discussed later, important points to remember about polyiso and its use include:Due to polyiso's very low air permeability, good design and installation practices can result in low risks of condensation, even for buildings with somewhat higher than normal humidity levels.Building designers can use the label R-value, stated at a mean temperature of 75°F, for projects in most ASHRAE climate zones. However, for climate zones 6 and 7, it may be appropriate to use published values at 40°F.Electricity is four times as expensive as gas, on an equivalent Btu basis. Therefore, polyiso's greatest value is seen during summer months when air conditioning usage is at its highest.IntroductionPolyiso has become the go-to insulation for commercial roofing with about 75 % market share. The reasons include:Lowest cost per R-value.High R-value per inch, meaning it doesn't require as much thickness as other types of rigid insulation to achieve the same insulation performance.Good fire resistance. Being a thermoset unlike polystyrene foams, it doesn't melt during a fire. Melting of thermoplastic foams and subsequent flowing down of molten material through the deck into a building can be hazardous for occupants and fire crews.Solvent compatibility - adhesives used in adhered systems don't adversely affect polyiso. This is not the case with polystyrene foams.Reduced condensation - When installed correctly in a properly designed system, polyiso helps to resist interior air from reaching the underside of the membrane, thereby reducing condensation risks.However, just because polyiso is specified and used doesn't mean that the ideal outcome is reached. There are installation details that need to be considered.Single-ply membrane combined with polyiso can make for a good roof, but additional factors can improve performance:The BasicsPolyiso boards have straight cut edges (the boards are not tongue and grooved). These butt joints between boards can allow for vertical air movement.Polyiso was often installed as a single layer:As shown in the figure above, a single layer of butt-jointed insulation is generally a bad idea and is no longer allowed by the International Building Code (IBC) in the 2018 and newer versions. For roofs with a single layer of butt-jointed insulation boards:There is little restriction for air flow and so, during wind events, wind uplift forces result in membrane billowing for attached systems.Membrane billowing draws interior conditioned air up to the underside of the membrane and may create a risk of condensation within the assembly.Billowing may place additional stress on membrane fasteners, a factor recognized by membrane manufacturers by the issuance of shorter guarantees or warranties for mechanically attached versus adhered membrane.Essentially unrestricted air flow up into the assembly diminishes the insulation value and lowers energy efficiency.In contrast, two layers of polyiso restrict the free flow of air into the roof assembly. Care must be taken to seal between roof penetrations and the polyiso, or air is still free to move up into the assembly as shown here:Spray foam is a good choice for achieving a seal between the polyiso and the penetrations.Two layers of polyiso with staggered joints and sealed penetrations is a good system, but two of its features still reduce its insulation efficacy. These are shown in the following magnified view of a roof assembly cross-section.This cross-section illustrates lower energy efficiency resulting from:Insulation and membrane fasteners both act as thermal bridges, conducting heat through the assembly.Gaps between insulation boards that allow thermal convection to occurWhen both the insulation and membrane are attached and fastener densities are at their highest, R-value reductions of up to 29 % have been predicted.Adhered versus AttachedThe alternative to mechanical attachment is to adhere the insulation with adhesive. Typically, low rise foam is the adhesive used for both insulation and cover board installation. The original method of application was as a ribbon but for labor savings it is often sprayed in a spatter-pattern as shown in the following picture of a typical installation in progress using one of GAF's low rise foamsUsually, when polyiso is adhered, the roof membrane is also adhered. For a steel deck substrate, fasteners are typically only used for the first layer of insulation, and then the adhesive is used on the subsequent layers of insulation and membrane. While it may be possible to adhere directly to a steel deck and eliminate fasteners totally, this approach is more common with concrete decks, as shown in the schematic here:Key features of systems with adhered insulation are:Air flow up through the assembly is limited and the risk of condensation in cold climates is low. Similarly, membrane billowing is minimized due to the restricted air flow up through adhered insulation layers.Thermal bridging is minimized since only the first layer of insulation might be mechanically attached. With concrete decks, the first layer of polyiso can be adhered thereby eliminating the use of fasteners totally.Wind uplift resistance is uniformly distributed across the roof deck. A system with adhered membrane and insulation can act as a monolithic system with excellent wind uplift resistance.When combined with an adhered membrane the finished roof appearance is usually aesthetically pleasing. When applied in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, the membrane can be very flat and there will not be any insulation fasteners to telegraph through and mar the appearance.Induction WeldedInduction welded fasteners are another type of roof attachment, the largest type being the Drill-Tec™ RhinoBond® system. By definition this is a mechanical attachment method but it has many of the features of adhered systems. The technique fastens TPO and PVC membranes to the substrate below using a microprocessor controlled induction welding machine. The thermoplastic roof membrane is welded directly to specially coated fastening plates used to attach the insulation. The picture below shows such a system being used:The induction machine is placed above each plate in turn and activated for approximately 10 seconds. As the machine is moved to the next position, a weighted magnet is placed over the plate and acts to squeeze the membrane down onto the hot fastener plate causing it to weld to that plate's surface coating.For typical mechanical attachment of single-ply membranes with fasteners along the seam lines, the insulation boards are simply secured with five fasteners per 4 x 8 ft. board to keep them flat. When using a Drill-Tec™ RhinoBond® system, the combined insulation and membrane fasteners resist wind uplift forces as shown in this picture during a test of wind uplift resistance:This means that wind loads are more uniformly distributed versus a conventionally attached system.Key features of systems with induction welded membrane attachment are:Performance is very similar to adhered in terms of the distribution of loads.Thermal bridging is reduced compared to traditional mechanically attached membrane systems.There are no application temperature restrictions and so this approach can be used in place of adhesive attachment regardless of how cold it might be.Drill-Tec™ RhinoBond® systems can be cost competitive due to the speed of installation as compared with traditional bucket and roller adhesives.Dew Point CalculationsThe dew point is the temperature at which moisture vapor forms condensation. It's a function of the relative humidity and the ambient temperature. The evaluation of a roof assembly where the dew point might be reached is an important step towards designing a roof with minimized condensation risks. The topic has been covered in greater depth elsewhere, but this section summarizes the key steps. Examine the chart below (this is a simplified form of what is used by HVAC engineers).Locating 40 % relative humidity in the first column and then going across to the 70°F, design dry bulb temperature shows a dew point of 45°F. This means that in an environment that is 70°F and 40 % relative humidity (RH), water in the air will condense at a temperature of 45°F. A roof assembly separates the interior conditioned environment from the outside and the insulation layer in the roofing system resists heat loss or gain to/from the outside, depending on the season. Within the insulation layer the temperature has a gradient between the hot and cold side, i.e. between inside and outside.As an example, consider a building in the winter to illustrate the point. The interior is 70 °F with 40 % RH, like the example on the chart above. The temperature gradually drops from the innermost part of the insulation until at the outermost part it will be at the exterior, cold temperature. The plotting of temperature through the insulation thickness is referred to as the temperature gradient of that system. Using the example, if the temperature gets to the dew point of 45°F at any point in that system then water would be expected to condense on the nearest surface. This is shown in the following diagram:Summarizing, in this example the interior air has 40 % of the total water vapor that it can support. But as the air migrates up through the roof system, it gets cooler until the point where it can no longer hold onto the water vapor and condensation occurs. In the example shown above, that's at 45°F and just inside the insulation layer.As will be discussed later, dew point calculations can be used to inform the placement of a vapor retarder layer when used.When a dedicated vapor retarder layer is not used, it is good practice to ensure that the dew point is in the upper layer of polyiso insulation. This will lower the risk of interior air migrating up through the roof assembly and condensing on a surface below its dew point.Using Vapor Retarders with PolyisoVapor retarders can be used to limit humidity ingress to the roof assembly. Under certain circumstances, depending on the building use and location, condensation can occur as discussed in the previous dew point discussion. In general there are four basic building conditions that can be considered:1. Buildings with Standard Amounts of Occupancy-Generated MoistureThese are the most common situations covering for example, office, retail, and warehouse spaces. The risk of having a condensation issue is low and good roofing practices such as sealing around penetrations may likely suffice.2. Buildings with Larger Amounts of Occupancy-Generated MoistureThis category includes apartments and other multiple residency buildings, paper mills, laundries, buildings with indoor swimming pools, and the like. In fact, anything that doesn't fit into category 1 above should be evaluated to determine humidity levels. The building's air handling and ventilation systems should be carefully specified to take into account the moisture loading.3. Construction-Related MoistureMost construction practices release some amount of moisture into the building space. These can be relatively short term such as drywall installation and painting. However, some practices can release large amounts of water over a considerable time frame into the building. These include poured in place concrete floors and roof decks.4. Concrete Roof DecksThese can present a challenge for roof system designers especially in new construction. Regardless of the type of concrete, significant amounts of water remain after curing is completed. Allowing concrete to thoroughly dry is most appropriate; however, it is often reasonably impractical. Dealing with potential moisture in concrete decks is beyond the scope of this article, but guidance can be found elsewhere.It is recommended that a building science professional experienced in designs for Categories 2, 3, and 4 be involved to determine whether a vapor retarder should be used and what type.Specification of R-ValuePolyiso is manufactured to meet the ASTM C1289 Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board. ASTM C1289 specifies the thermal resistance at a mean temperature of 75°F for various product thicknesses and requires that the values at 40 and 110°F be made available upon request.Important features of manufacturer's published R-values are:The values are an average across a temperature range. The test methods need the insulation specimen to have a hot and a cold side at least 40°F apart. Most reputable test labs use a difference of 50°F for accuracy. A published value at 75°F is actually an average R-value across the range of 50 to 100°F.To take into account the diffusion of gas out of, and air into the polyiso foam, the values are based on projected "Long Term Thermal Resistance" or LTTR, obtained by rapidly aging thin slices of the foam.The Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Association, PIMA, conducts a third-party certification program to independently validate LTTR values. This is referred to as the PIMA QualityMark™ program. The LTTR values are considered as "labelled R-values" to be used by building design professionals.Label R-values represent a 15-year time-weighted average value. They can help a design professional estimate a building's energy efficiency without having to be concerned about long-term loss of performance, which is already factored into the value.Building design professionals designing roofs for ASHRAE climate zones 6 and 7 may need to use the R-value reported for a mean temperature of 40°F.Attachment PatternsThe various fastener patterns for polyiso have been mentioned in the previous sections. However, due to the impact of fasteners on thermal bridging and wind uplift resistance, the key points are summarized here:For systems that have both mechanically attached membrane and insulation, the membrane attachment provides the wind uplift resistance. The polyiso insulation fasteners are simply there to hold the insulation flat during the roof installation and to resist long term lateral movement.Typical fastener patterns are shown here:For systems with adhered single-ply membrane and mechanically attached polyiso boards, the insulation fasteners provide the wind uplift load resistance. This is the case whether both layers of polyiso are mechanically attached or only the bottom layer (in which case the upper layer would be adhered).Manufacturers have tested the fasteners per board required to meet wind uplift resistance requirements for these combined mechanically attached and adhered systems. The number of fasteners needed depends on the board size and thickness. For common systems, the numbers are shown in the table below:For each of these combinations above, manufacturers' handbooks provide fastener patterns.The number of fasteners for these combined mechanically attached and adhered systems is very large, for example a 125 000 s.f. big box type roof could require around 50 000 fasteners, resulting in significant thermal bridging.When installing over a steel deck, to reduce thermal bridging and to make for a more robust system with reduced condensation risk, it is advisable to only attach the first layer of polyiso and to adhere all subsequent layers and the membrane.If the first layer of polyiso is attached and the rest of the system adhered, then using a 1,5" thickness for that first layer would help to bury the thermal bridging fasteners. It could also put the dividing line between first and second polyiso layers below the dew point, which is advisable.ConclusionsPolyiso is a cost-effective roof insulation and has the advantage that its permeability is low. Good design and installation practices can result in low risks of condensation even for buildings with higher than normal humidity levels.When designed correctly, mechanically attached components with two layers of polyiso having staggered and offset joints can be part of a successful roof system.Adhered insulation and membrane roof systems have advantages including reduced or eliminated thermal bridging, lowered condensation risks, and better wind uplift resistance.In cases where building use anticipates higher interior humidity levels and/or the local climate suggests higher condensation risk, then a building science professional should be consulted as to vapor retarder use and specification.Building designers and specifiers are advised to use the labelled R-values shown for a mean temperature of 75°F. For projects in ASHRAE climate zones 5 and 6, values at 40°F could be used depending on the building's geometry and local energy costs.

    By Thomas J Taylor

    17 mars 2021

  • GAF Cedar City plant
    Science du bâtiment

    Comment la norme ASCE 7-16 affectera-t-elle l'industrie des toitures à faible pente? Histoire de deux bâtiments

    On demande souvent, dans l'industrie des toitures, si la version 2016 de la norme ASCE 7 augmentera la pression éolienne exercée sur le bâtiment. La réponse est oui dans de nombreux cas. La question suivante est donc : dans quelle mesure? And, that leads to the next question, "how much more capacity will roof systems be required to have when wind design follows ASCE 7-16?"This blog looks at 2 buildings of different sizes and heights in two cities in the U.S., one centrally located and one along the Gulf coast, and compares design wind pressures based on ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16. By assessing the required roof-system capacity for all roof zones in conjunction with the increases in the size of roof zones, we can begin to put some real numbers to the question "by how much will ASCE 7-16 affect the low-slope roofing industry?"While analysis of two building types in two cities doesn't represent a significant study, this study offers an example of how the 2016 version of ASCE 7 is going to affect installed roofing systems over the next decade.Case StudiesDesign wind pressures (DWP) were determined for two building types in two cities. DWPs were based on varying the Risk Category and Exposure. The following table shows the building types, cities, variables, and constants.The big box store is 290' long x 169' wide x 24' tall, and the apartment building is 100' long x 40' wide x 55' tall. Wind speeds were determined using an online tool.DWPs can be determined by using proprietary third party methods (e.g., RoofNav), simplified calculation tools (e.g., RoofWindDesigner), or hand calculations following the methods within the ASCE 7 standard.For this case study, DWPs were determined using hand calculations via an Excel spreadsheet. The DWPs are slightly more refined since there was no rounding of wind speeds for ASCE 7-16. Both RoofNav and Roof Wind Designer round to the nearest 5 or 10 mph. The maps in ASCE 7-16 have been revised, not only from a wind speed perspective but from the number of wind isobars on the maps. The ASCE 7-16 maps are more refined which allows for more exact wind speed values.ASCE 7-10 Map, Risk Category II, showing a limited number of wind-speed isobars.ASCE 7-16 Map, Risk Category II, showing many additional wind-speed isobars relative to the ASCE 7-10 wind map shown in the above figure.In total, 72 different sets of DWPs were calculated. Buildings over 60' tall are designed the same in ASCE 7-16 as in ASCE 7-10; therefore, this article focuses on buildings less than 60' tall.Design Wind Pressure ResultsThe following charts provide the DWPs for each of the scenarios that were analyzed for this article.Design wind pressures based on ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16 for a big box store in Kansas City, MO that is 24' tall.Design wind pressures based on ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16 for a big box store in Mobile, AL that is 24' tall.Design wind pressures based on ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16 for a 5-story apartment building in Kansas City, MO that is 55' tall.Design wind pressures based on ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16 for a 5-story apartment building in Mobile, AL that is 55' tall.Comparing the 2010 and 2016 versionsThe primary intent of this article is to start generating data to help answer the question "how much did the DWP increase from the 2010 version to the 2016 version of ASCE 7?" Using the DWP calculated for each roof zone within each of the four scenarios, we calculated the percent increase in DWP per zone. The percent increases in DWP were calculated by dividing the ASCE 7-16 value with the corresponding ASCE 7-10 value for each roof zone. However, because there are 4 roof zones in ASCE 7-16 (and 3 roof zones in ASCE 7-10), both Roof Zones 1' and 1 were divided by the value for ASCE 7-10 Roof Zone 1 to determine the percent increase. Values in the following charts that are below 100 % (shaded gray) indicate a reduction in DWP from ASCE 7-10 to 7-16.Percent increases in DWP per roof zone for a big box store in Kansas City, MO that is 24' tall, focusing on Exposure C values.Percent increases in DWP per roof zone for a big box store in Mobile, AL that is 24' tall, focusing on Exposure C values.Percent increases in DWP per roof zone for a 5-story apartment building in Kansas City, MO that is 55' tall, focusing on Exposure C values.Percent increases in DWP per roof zone for a 5-story apartment building in Mobile, AL that is 55' tall, focusing on Exposure C values.For the big box store scenarios, the percent increases in DWP per roof zone varies from 84 % to 178 %. The percent reductions (values less than 100 %) are all in Roof Zone 1' while Roof Zones 1, 2, and 3 have increased DWP. As seen in the Figures, Roof Zone 1 percent increases are greatest while Roof Zone 3 increases are smallest.For the 5-story apartment building scenarios, the percent increases in DWP per roof zone varies from 84 % to 177 %. The percent increases in Roof Zone 1 are the largest. The percent reductions are all Roof Zone 1'.It is worth noting that the increases in Pressure Coefficients from ASCE 7-10 to 7-16 are, in fact, relatively indicative of the increases in DWP. For more on Pressure Coefficients and the wind design process.The case studies in this blog also show that the 2016 version of ASCE 7 imposes higher DWPs in Roof Zones 1, 2, and 3. However, given some of the substantial reductions in Roof Zone 1', it could be expected that installed roof system capacity may be lower. While that is hopeful, the roofing industry has a minimum-capacity backstop of 60 psf. This means that any calculated DWP at or below 60 psf (even for DWP values as low as 23 psf) will have a 60-psf-capacity roof assembly installed to meet building code requirements. The reality is many buildings are required to use a 60-psf-capacity roof system when in fact '60 psf' is more capacity than needed based on calculated DWPs.Let's take a closer look at one subset for each of the 4 scenarios.Example 1: Big Box; Central USThe big box store in KC, MO (Risk Category II, Exposure C) saw the DWP increase from 38 psf to 56 psf in Roof Zone 1 per ASCE 7-10 vs ASCE 7-16; and reduce to 32 psf in Roof Zone 1'. Regardless of the increases or decreases, a 60-psf-capacity roof should be installed in both Roof Zone 1 and Roof Zone 1' per 7-16, which is unchanged relative to ASCE 7-10.Roof zones and pressures for a 24' tall big box store in Kansas City, MO based on ASCE 7-10 using Risk Category II and Exposure C.Roof zones and pressures for a 24' tall big box store in Kansas City, MO based on ASCE 7-16 using Risk Category II and Exposure C.For Roof Zones 2 and 3, the DWPs are not only increased, but the sizes of the roof zones that require higher capacity are also increased. Roof Zone 2 per ASCE 7-10 required a 75-psf-capacity roof, and a 75-psf-capacity roof will be needed per ASCE 7-16. However, approximately 9 % of the roof area will need a higher capacity because of the increase in roof zone size. The following chart shows roof area percentages based on the required roof system capacity for this scenario.Chart showing required roof capacity and the roof area (%) where each is required.Example 2: Big Box; Gulf CoastA big box store in Mobile, AL (Risk Category II, Exposure C) saw the DWP increase from 69 psf to 109 psf in Roof Zone 1 per ASCE 7-10 vs ASCE 7-16; and reduce to 63 psf in Roof Zone 1'. A 75-psf-capacity roof should be installed in Roof Zone 1', and higher-capacity roofs will be required in Roof Zones 1, 2, and 3 relative to ASCE 7-10.Roof zones and pressures for a 24' tall big box store in Mobile, AL based on ASCE 7-10 using Risk Category II and Exposure C.Roof zones and pressures for a 24' tall big box store in Mobile, AL based on ASCE 7-16 using Risk Category II and Exposure C.For Roof Zones 1, 2, and 3, the DWPs are not only increased, but the size of the roof zones that require higher capacity are also increased. A larger perimeter roof zone (combining Roof Zones 1 and 2) with higher required capacity is created (relative to 7-10). Approximately 30+% of the roof area will need a higher capacity. The following chart shows roof area percentages based on the required roof system capacity for this scenario.Chart showing required roof capacity and the roof area (%) where each is required.Example 3: 5-story; Central USThe 5-story apartment building in KC, MO (Risk Category II, Exposure C) saw the DWP increase from 45 psf to 66 psf in Roof Zone 1 per ASCE 7-10 vs ASCE 7-16; and reduce to 38 psf in Roof Zone 1'.However, because the method used to determine the sizes of roof zones in ASCE 7-16 is changed, Roof Zones 1' and 1 do not exist on this building! Decreases of DWP in Roof Zone 1' are rendered meaningless, and the lack of a Roof Zones 1' and 1 means the entire roof consists of only Roof Zones 2 and 3, the perimeter and corner roof zones.Roof zones and pressures for a 55' tall apartment building in Kansas City, MO based on ASCE 7-16 (top) and ASCE 7-10 (bottom) using Risk Cat II and Exposure C.The increases in DWPs for the roof zones significantly increase the roof system capacity requirements for this scenario. Almost the entire roof area will need a higher capacity roof. The following chart shows roof area percentages based on the required roof system capacity for this scenario.Chart showing required roof capacity and the roof area (%) where each is required.Example 4: 5-story; Gulf CoastThe 5-story apartment building in Mobile, AL (Risk Category II, Exposure C) saw the DWP increase from 81 psf to 129 psf in Roof Zone 1 per ASCE 7-10 vs ASCE 7-16; and reduce to 74 psf in Roof Zone 1'. Similar to Example 3, due to the size of the roof zones relative to the size of the roof, Roof Zones 1' and 1 do not exist in this scenario.Roof zones and pressures for a 55' tall apartment building in Mobile, AL based on ASCE 7-16 (top) and ASCE 7-10 (bottom) using Risk Cat II and Exposure C.The increases in DWP for the roof zones significantly increase the roof system capacity requirements for this scenario. The entire roof area will need a higher capacity. The following chart shows roof area percentages based on the required roof system capacity for this scenario.Performance versus PrescriptiveThe case studies in this analysis are presented using a performance method for wind design. That is, a specific DWP is determined for each roof zone and a roof system with appropriate capacity is selected for use in the associated roof zone. Another method that is often used in the roofing industry is a prescriptive method for wind design. The DWP for Roof Zone 1 (or Roof Zone 1' in certain localities) is used to select a roof system with an appropriate capacity for Roof Zone 1 (similar to a performance method), and then Roof Zones 2 and 3 use an installation method/layout that is prescriptively increased relative to Roof Zone 1 installation methods. Prescriptive installation methods for Roof Zones 2 and 3 are regularly used with mechanically attached (MA) roof systems, and for MA roofs, Roof Zone 2 increases are commonly 50 % and Roof Zone 3 increases are commonly 100 %.ConclusionASCE 7-16 DWPs are generally increasing relative to ASCE 7-10, but this impact is better understood by comparing the required roof system capacity for different building types and dimensions in different cities. Looking only at DWPs does not provide enough information; a comparison of required roof system capacities is needed. Not only did the DWPs change, but the methodology for determining the size of the perimeter and corner roof zones changed significantly in the new ASCE 7-16 version; the amount of roof area contained by the perimeter and corner roof zones increased. The case studies-of two buildings less than 60 ft tall in two cities-and corresponding analysis in this blog are just one additional small step to understanding how the ASCE 7-16 will affect wind design over the next decade.

    By James R Kirby

    21 février 2021